Search for: All records

Shade avoidance syndrome is an important adaptive strategy. Under shade, major transcriptional rearrangements underlie the reallocation of resources to elongate vegetative structures and redefine the plant architecture to compete for photosynthesis. BBX28 is a B-box transcription factor involved in seedling de-etiolation and flowering in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), but its function in shade-avoidance response is completely unknown. Here, we studied the function of BBX28 using two mutant and two transgenic lines of Arabidopsis exposed to white light and simulated shade conditions. We found that BBX28 promotes hypocotyl growth under shade through the phytochrome system by perceiving the reduction of red photons but not the reduction of photosynthetically active radiation or blue photons. We demonstrated that hypocotyl growth under shade is sustained by the protein accumulation of BBX28 in the nuclei in a CONSTITUTIVE PHOTOMORPHOGENESIS1 (COP1)-dependent manner at the end of the photoperiod. BBX28 up-regulates the expression of transcription factor- and auxin-related genes, thereby promoting hypocotyl growth under prolonged shade. Overall, our results suggest the role of BBX28 in COP1 signaling to sustain the shade-avoidance response and extend the well-known participation of other members of BBX transcription factors for fine-tuning plant growth under shade. 

Abstract The precise onset of flowering is crucial to ensure successful plant reproduction. The geneFLOWERING LOCUS T(FT) encodes florigen, a mobile signal produced in leaves that initiates flowering at the shoot apical meristem. In response to seasonal changes,FTis induced in phloem companion cells located in distal leaf regions. Thus far, a detailed molecular characterization of theFT-expressing cells has been lacking. Here, we used bulk nuclei RNA-seq and single nuclei RNA (snRNA)-seq to investigate gene expression inFT-expressing cells and other phloem companion cells. Our bulk nuclei RNA-seq demonstrated thatFT-expressing cells in cotyledons and in true leaves differed transcriptionally. Within the true leaves, our snRNA-seq analysis revealed that companion cells with highFTexpression form a unique cluster in which many genes involved in ATP biosynthesis are highly upregulated. The cluster also expresses other genes encoding small proteins, including the flowering and stem growth inducer FPF1-LIKE PROTEIN 1 (FLP1) and the anti-florigen BROTHER OF FT AND TFL1 (BFT). In addition, we found that the promoters ofFTand the genes co-expressed withFTin the cluster were enriched for the consensus binding motifs of NITRATE-INDUCIBLE GARP-TYPE TRANSCRIPTIONAL REPRESSOR 1 (NIGT1). Overexpression of the paralogousNIGT1.2andNIGT1.4repressedFTexpression and significantly delayed flowering under nitrogen-rich conditions, consistent with NIGT1s acting as nitrogen-dependentFTrepressors. Taken together, our results demonstrate that majorFT-expressing cells show a distinct expression profile that suggests that these cells may produce multiple systemic signals to regulate plant growth and development. 

Abstract Proper cell-type identity relies on highly coordinated regulation of gene expression. Regulatory elements such as enhancers can produce cell type-specific expression patterns, but the mechanisms underlying specificity are not well understood. We previously identified an enhancer region capable of driving specific expression in giant cells, which are large, highly endoreduplicated cells in the Arabidopsis thaliana sepal epidermis. In this study, we use the giant cell enhancer as a model to understand the regulatory logic that promotes cell type-specific expression. Our dissection of the enhancer revealed that giant cell specificity is mediated primarily through the combination of two activators and one repressor. HD-ZIP and TCP transcription factors are involved in the activation of expression throughout the epidermis. High expression of HD-ZIP transcription factor genes in giant cells promoted higher expression driven by the enhancer in giant cells. Dof transcription factors repressed the activity of the enhancer such that only giant cells maintained enhancer activity. Thus, our data are consistent with a conceptual model whereby cell type-specific expression emerges from the combined activities of three transcription factor families activating and repressing expression in epidermal cells. 

Shade avoidance syndrome (SAS) is a strategy of major adaptive significance and typically includes elongation of the stem and petiole, leaf hyponasty, reduced branching and phototropic orientation of the plant shoot toward canopy gaps. Both cryptochrome 1 and phytochrome B (phyB) are the major photoreceptors that sense the reduction in the blue light fluence rate and the low red:far-red ratio, respectively, and both light signals are associated with plant density and the resource reallocation when SAS responses are triggered. The B-box (BBX)-containing zinc finger transcription factor BBX24 has been implicated in the SAS as a regulator of DELLA activity, but this interaction does not explain all the observed BBX24-dependent regulation in shade light. Here, through a combination of transcriptional meta-analysis and large-scale identification of BBX24-interacting transcription factors, we found that JAZ3, a jasmonic acid signaling component, is a direct target of BBX24. Furthermore, we demonstrated that joint loss of BBX24 and JAZ3 function causes insensitivity to DELLA accumulation, and the defective shade-induced elongation in this mutant is rescued by loss of DELLA or phyB function. Therefore, we propose that JAZ3 is part of the regulatory network that controls the plant growth in response to shade, through a mechanism in which BBX24 and JAZ3 jointly regulate DELLA activity. Our results provide new insights into the participation of BBX24 and JA signaling in the hypocotyl shade avoidance response in Arabidopsis. 

Summary Arsenic poses a global threat to living organisms, compromising crop security and yield. Limited understanding of the transcriptional network integrating arsenic‐tolerance mechanisms with plant developmental responses hinders the development of strategies against this toxic metalloid.Here, we conducted a high‐throughput yeast one‐hybrid assay using as baits the promoter region from the arsenic‐inducible genesARQ1andASK18fromArabidopsis thaliana, coupled with a transcriptomic analysis, to uncover novel transcriptional regulators of the arsenic response.We identified the GLABRA2 (GL2) transcription factor as a novel regulator of arsenic tolerance, revealing a wider regulatory role beyond its established function as a repressor of root hair formation. Furthermore, we found that ANTHOCYANINLESS2 (ANL2), a GL2 subfamily member, acts redundantly with this transcription factor in the regulation of arsenic signaling. Both transcription factors act as repressors of arsenic response.gl2andanl2mutants exhibit enhanced tolerance and reduced arsenic accumulation. Transcriptional analysis in thegl2mutant unveils potential regulators of arsenic tolerance.These findings highlight GL2 and ANL2 as novel integrators of the arsenic response with developmental outcomes, offering insights for developing safer crops with reduced arsenic content and increased tolerance to this hazardous metalloid. 

SUMMARY Transcriptional regulators of the general stress response (GSR) reprogram the expression of selected genes to transduce informational signals into cellular events, ultimately manifested in a plant's ability to cope with environmental challenges. Identification of the core GSR regulatory proteins will uncover the principal modules and their mode of action in the establishment of adaptive responses. To define the GSR regulatory components, we employed a yeast‐one‐hybrid assay to identify the protein(s) binding to the previously established functional GSR motif, termed the rapid stress response element (RSRE). This led to the isolation of octadecanoid‐responsive AP2/ERF‐domain transcription factor 47 (ORA47), a methyl jasmonate inducible protein. Subsequently, ORA47 transcriptional activity was confirmed using the RSRE‐driven luciferase (LUC) activity assay performed in the ORA47 loss‐ and gain‐of‐function lines introgressed into the 4xRSRE::Luc background. In addition, the prime contribution of CALMODULIN‐BINDING TRANSCRIPTIONAL ACTIVATOR3 (CAMTA3) protein in the induction of RSRE was reaffirmed by genetic studies. Moreover, exogenous application of methyl jasmonate led to enhanced levels ofORA47andCAMTA3transcripts, as well as the induction of RSRE::LUC activity. Metabolic analyses illustrated the reciprocal functional inputs of ORA47 and CAMTA3 in increasing JA levels. Lastly, transient assays identified JASMONATE ZIM‐domain1 (JAZ1) as a repressor of RSRE::LUC activity. Collectively, the present study provides fresh insight into the initial features of the mechanism that transduces informational signals into adaptive responses. This mechanism involves the functional interplay between the JA biosynthesis/signaling cascade and the transcriptional reprogramming that potentiates GSR. Furthermore, these findings offer a window into the role of intraorganellar communication in the establishment of adaptive responses. 

Abstract ARGONAUTES are the central effector proteins ofRNAsilencing which bind target transcripts in a smallRNA‐guided manner.Arabidopsis thalianahas 10ARGONAUTE(AGO) genes, with specialized roles inRNA‐directedDNAmethylation, post‐transcriptional gene silencing, and antiviral defense. To better understand specialization amongAGOgenes at the level of transcriptional regulation we tested a library of 1497 transcription factors for binding to the promoters ofAGO1,AGO10, andAGO7using yeast 1‐hybrid assays. A ranked list of candidateDNA‐bindingTFs revealed binding of theAGO7promoter by a number of proteins in two families: the miR156‐regulatedSPLfamily and the miR319‐regulatedTCPfamily, both of which have roles in developmental timing and leaf morphology. Possible functions forSPLandTCPbinding are unclear: we showed that these binding sites are not required for the polar expression pattern ofAGO7, nor for the function ofAGO7in leaf shape. NormalAGO7transcription levels and function appear to depend instead on an adjacent 124‐bp region. Progress in understanding the structure of this promoter may aid efforts to understand how the conservedAGO7‐triggeredTAS3pathway functions in timing and polarity.